DogCast Radio
Home Episodes Articles Blog Breed profiles Book reviews Photos Contact

Is it both breeders and puppy buyers' responsibility to improve the health and happiness of our dog population?

Some food for thought from What's In My Genes:

The health of our UK dog population is heading into crisis. Dogs unable to breath, walk, run, play, heads too small for their brains, living in constant pain and /or discomfort which as well as causing mental distress/heartache and financial difficulties for puppy buyers is leading to problems with aggression/behaviour with even more animals ending up in rescue.

The signs are there – it is growing into a serious public health risk – people are experiencing poor mental health due to the stress of living with a “member” of the family with a chronic illness, financial hardship/ hard decisions having to be made re cost of surgery and medication, and potentially more physical risk with dogs having more and more temperament issues. The government needs to do something and it needs to do it now.

It needs to be a two-pronged approach – breeders need to understand the need to breed responsibly and us, the puppy buyer, need to understand what our demand for certain breeds of dogs is driving.

The team at the What’s in my Genes? campaign (raising awareness of hereditary diseases in dogs) have come up with a petition to tackle part of the problem. Breeding should be done thoughtfully and fully researched with adequate training to give pups of the future the best chance of a happy healthy life.

https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/605082

This petition asks for ALL breeding dogs to be registered , but registered subject to health test together with conformation & temperament assessments whilst taking genetic diversity (COI) into consideration, caveats would of course be included regards certain aspects such as breeding a carrier dog.

• There is already a registration system up and running by the Kennel Club, having these tests mandatory for registration takes away the need for the kennel club to enforce – they would simply receive the results along with the registration request and if results are acceptable would then register – the kennel club don’t want to enforce and this way they wouldn’t have too and it would rebuild their reputation as to the go to place for as healthy pup as possible.

• An independent panel of vets can produce a list of the most serious & detrimental breed specific hereditary diseases for which testing will be mandatory.

• A network of behaviourist up and down the country could assess the dogs’ temperament according to a pre designed assessment form, potentially with a caveat that this dog could be bred for a certain function but not as a pet.

• Their local Vet could assess conformation again as per a pre designed assessment form

• The KC already has an algorithm for COI.

It would be less time consuming/easier for LA inspector when it comes to licencing as they would know that a registered dog had already been deemed suitable for breeding and they can concentrate on other aspects of the inspection.

This particular part of the Animal Welfare Regulations needs clarifying:
Part B – Specific conditions: breeding dogs (Schedule 6 of the Regulations) Condition 6.5 No dog may be kept for breeding if it can reasonably be expected, on the basis of its genotype, phenotype or state of health that breeding from it could have a detrimental effect on its health or welfare or the health or welfare of its offspring.
Reasonably expected needs to be clarified by a mandatory standard for hereditary health testing, temperament and conformation assessments with appropriate caveats in place such as breeding of carriers of specific diseases. This petition aims to do just that.

Puppy buyers need a “Kite Mark” indicating a “responsible” breeder – this registration would be just that. We’re never going to change puppy buying from a heart purchase to a head purchase without making it easier for puppy buyers to find a reputable breed and have a definition of what a reputable breeder is.

What the puppy buyer can do..

We hear time after time the breeder has to compromise because of genetic diversity (COI) within the breed they are involved with, we believe compromise is unacceptable and leads to continued “production” of unhealthy unsound poorly conformed pups.

Dogs are a species there are hundreds and thousands of them. They don’t have to be narrowed down into specific breed type – we the puppy buying public need to look at the way we perceive and buy dogs as a whole.

Maybe its time to stop looking a dogs by breed but actually:

• Service Dog
• Work Dog
• Sports Dog
• And most importantly Pet Dog
• Other functions

Could this be the way forward for puppy buyers. Breeders can still preserve their breed but maybe looking at it from a different perspective – prioritising function first – after all most dogs were initially bred for function – herding, guarding, sports etc…

Can we start changing the way we choose our dogs by looks (Breed) as a priority and move towards choosing for function. Choosing a puppy born to be a pet. Not excess from a litter born for sport, or working, or agility.

It is us the puppy buying public’s responsibility to drive the demand for healthier happier pups which can live happily and healthily in our homes.

But we also need help in knowing a responsible breeder and the above mentioned “kite mark” is definitely a way forward with perhaps a specific “bred to be a pet” mark too.

So please sign our petition to encourage responsible breeding and let’s start talking about function health and temperament rather than looks. https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/605082

Sharing

281 - dog AITA and am I being unreasonable

In this podcast, host Julie considers a variety of Reddit AITA questions, and Am I Being Unreasonable from Mumsnet. We have stories of a puppy biting a child at a family get together, the pet sitting friend who took the dog to doggy daycare, the rescue dog defender feeling the pressure to meet up for dog walks, the sister who caused trouble when she said her sister's baby name sounded like a dog's name, the devoted owner who ducked out of his brother's wedding to care for his injured dog, an off lead dog causing issues and two alleged service dogs joining at the children's playground. Do you agree with Julie's take on all these canine conundrums?

189 - The Dog Healers and War Dogs Remembered

In this episode you can hear Mark Winik talk about his debut novel, The Dog Healers, and listen to Julia Robertson explain why she founded the charity War Dogs remembered. Plus there's the DogCast Radio News, and what Mischief the German Spitz puppy has been up to.

188 - Service Dogs UK and Roxie the Doxie Finds Her Forever Home

In this episode you can hear about Service Dogs UK, a fantastic charity which trains assistance dogs to support veterans of any service - military personnel, police, firefighters, paramedics and the coastguard - who develop Post Traumatic Stress Disorder due to their job. Also, listen to Dr Jody A Dean, a clinical psychologist talk about how her book, Roxie the Doxie finds her Forever Home, is helping children understand and talk about adoption and other family issues. Plus the DogCast Radio News and some thoughts on the alpha dog myth.

187 - Muffins Halo and Chorley Fun Dog Show

In this episode you can hear about Muffin's Halo for Blind Dogs, and what motivates people to enter their dog in a fun dog show. In the DogCast Radio News, listen to stories about the latest dog related research. Plus there's a new member of the DogCast Radio team!

186 - Maxwell Muir on wolves

In this episode you can hear trainer, behaviourist, writer, broadcaster and wolf expert Maxwell Muir talk about what wolves mean to him personally, their plight in a modern world, and his hopes for their future. Plus we have the DogCast Radio News.